The Grinder wrote:Any device with a Prince Albert or other similar piercing incorporated into the design has the potential to be a lot more effective. I doubt I have one millimeter of wiggle room around my piercing and really wouldn't want to try that route.
There are a number of devices that enclose your penis rather than cage it. Some fit almost exactly, like a Lori's tube or mousetrap, others aren't quite so exact but offer much more coverage. If you can't move because of the piercing and you can't touch much due to the enclosure, it seems plausible you would get better results out of your device.
Thanks--these are helpful suggestions. I've actually thought about getting a PA for chastity purposes. The idea of not being able to pull out of a device is really hot--though it would be less hot if the device didn't prevent me from getting off. But I've never had a piercing, and I have to say I'm more than a little nervous about it. It would be very uncharacteristic of me. If I did get a PA, my partner would think first, "This is awesome," and then "Wait, is this really my partner, and not his alien doppleganer?"
lockedsteve wrote:I have always wondered why guys want to masturbate when they are the ones who asked for chastity. I really would like to learn why. I find it interesting since my approach is so different. Not better, just different. I look at it as if a cuckold was trying to prevent his wife from having sex with other men. He is defeating the one thing he wants. If you do not mind I am willing to listen and learn.
For me, chastity is like bondage. Different people who are into bondage enjoy it in different ways. For some people, being restrained is a means of experiencing sensations (from sex, from tickling, from SM, or from the bondage itself). For these people it doesn't matter whether they're able to escape the bondage. They're not going to try to escape, because the bondage is a means to sensation play, which they want.
For other people (like me), bondage is only really exciting if it's inescapable. I like being under my partner's physical control, and I enjoy the control for its own sake, not as a means to sensation play. So if he ties me up, I am going to test the knots. You could ask, "Why would you want to get out of the bondage your partner put you in? You wanted to be tied up, after all." The answer is that if I seriously test my bonds and discover that I genuinely can't get out, it is really hot.
Asking me why I want a chastity device that makes it genuinely difficult to get off is like asking me why I want to be tied up in a way that makes it genuinely difficult to escape. The answer is that if I discover that I truly can't get off without my partner's permission, that is hot. The point of chastity for me isn't to avoid cumming; it's to be unable to cum.
A chastity device that prevents me from getting off while I'm in it, but that I can slip out of with soap and time, is sort of like being put in handcuffs when I know I have a spare key on my dresser drawer and could get to it if I really wanted to. It's still hot, though not as hot as being locked up without any access to the key. A chastity device that doesn't prevent me from getting off when I'm in it is sort of like having my hands tied in front of me with the knots in easy reach of my fingers. That might be fun for some people, but for me, there wouldn't be much point.