First, if you don't already know it, I'm not chastity folk. My interest is rooted in my curiousity and enjoyment of playing with senses. So, there is no keyholder and no grand plan and not really a future. Second, I'm a mean old man, emphasis on mean. So I'm not going out of my way to piss people off, but I'm not sugar coating either.
Why the 6000s? Well, because my parts are short, especially in the unexcited mode. However, if you have large balls or thick skin in the scrotum, you might want to reconsider this decision and go with the 6000. I don't know if that would have helped, since the device seems to be designed to squeeze the balls down and in. I went for the largest ring first and it was a difficult fit. Next up, hair. This is not a sport for the hirsute. I don't know whether a trim would have helped any or if you have to go all the way down to bare skin, but this device was not hair friendly.
Also, assemble and disassemble the thing a few times just to get the new rubbed off and get the force fits a little looser. When you get to the magic moment, all those previous reviews that emphasized lube were absolutely right. I tried all the pins and found I could use the shortest one.
It did make a noticeable bump in my jeans. Yes, in the interest of science I got the thing on and then put my jeans back on. I wear relaxed fit jeans, but I looked like I had a cup on. Maybe you could use that as an excuse. Like those people that have to wear helmets all the time because they can't get hit in the head.
The magic moment? Well, I didn't actually click a lock on. First, it didn't come with a lock, although it was supposed to. Second, I didn't think there was a point to it. However, once I had the thing on, there was a distinct sensation of having reached a point of no return. I had a girlfriend way back when that liked to be tied up. She was very careful about revealing this, for reasons I completely understand, but I digress. Despite knowing, or at least being very sure that I wasn't going to hurt her, she always had what I call the 'oh shit' moment, the look on her face after she did a litte squirm or tug and realized she could not get loose without me. I had that moment despite the certitude that the device wouldn't be sticking around. The excitement was intense and for a moment I thought I'd have an orgasm despite the device. That tension remained for the entire hour of the experiment.
The aftermath. Getting it on, keeping it on, and taking it off caused some hair removal, one little red place where I got pinched, and a bruised sensation in a spot on my crotch. I didn't try peeing or orgasming, though I think I might have been able to. Once the device was cleaned and stored, I returned to the internet to re-read some of the things I've read before on this site, Sarah Jameson's blog, and a couple of other chastity sites.
This is where my honesty is going to get me booed off stage. As a bedroom game, I think I understand the appeal. But I don't get the whole denial thing, and some of the denial posts were effing creepy. A year without an orgasm? A lifetime? And I'm not talking about the fantastical posts where some guy dreams of a hot babe placing him in chastity and making him wear frilly girl clothes. I'm talking about what seems to be a mainstream notion of orgasm and organ control. I found several posts on Jameson's blog to be effing disturbing, like the one by Jenny or Jennifer who apparently talked her husband into long term (she hopes lifetime) denial. Seriously? Or most of the things written on Lori Lancer's site? To me, this is as messed up as the days of old, which I think I recall, when a husband could force his attentions on his wife and it wasn't considered rape. Sure, she could leave him, but that had consequences as well. So when I see a post that purports to be from some super controlling woman who waxes eloquent about her strict control of hubby's pecker, I think maybe the pendulum has swung too far the other way. And sure the guy could say no and leave, but in today's legal environment (in America at least) that has unpleasant consequences.
Well, that was more bloviating than I intended to do, but I did warn you first...I think

Eido