Maybe the moderators can make you the site arbitrator.

What I took from that was hiskh thinking that there is a natural or automatic incorporation of humiliation that came along with the chastity kink. And in my own defense, I think that most of us have run across this attitude in many other places around the internet.I am not really into this either but I am very interested as to why it (i.e., humiliation) seems to be a part of the life style.
To my way of thinking, the habits of people who dabble with chastity are too varied to be a coherent set.Definition of Lifestyle: a set of attitudes, habits, or possessions associated with a particular person or group
Umm... Transporter accident?sub2olive wrote: As if somebody else wrote these lines. But let's hear what he says about this.
I can understand that you may not have communicated what you intended. However, you just reiterated what I take exception to: that chastity isn't a lifestyle. Just because fantasy-dominated forums refer to this as a lifestyle the same way the internet doms and subs call their stuff a lifestyle, doesn't change the fact that for some of us it really is. Similarly the leather community has a lot of real life people who live a d/s lifestyle that doesn't conform to the Internet definitions.Tom Allen wrote:Hmm, obviously what I wrote came across in a way I hadn't intended. I apologize for the tone (again, not intended that way), and allow me try this again.
I was really responding to what I read into this sentence:What I took from that was hiskh thinking that there is a natural or automatic incorporation of humiliation that came along with the chastity kink. And in my own defense, I think that most of us have run across this attitude in many other places around the internet.I am not really into this either but I am very interested as to why it (i.e., humiliation) seems to be a part of the life style.
My contention is that there is no "lifestyle" in the sense (or meaning) that we all approach this differently; and with so many different approaches to chastity/OD, you can't call it a lifestyle, certainly not one in the sense that there are certain parameters which are necessarily entailed.
Mrs. Edge and I do not incorporate any humiliation - it's a turn-off for both of us. I happen to know that there are other people who are fairly similar in practice, because I hear from them often. The only thing differentiating what they do from plain vanilla life is that they are locked up at their wife's discretion. There's no doing humiliating tasks, no dressing in humiliating clothing, no being forced to go to the doctor's or the gym, or wherever, with the risk or probability of discovery.
Some people do have a lifestyle approach, but to my way of thinking, the lifestyle is the other practice (cross-dressing, cuckolding, whatever) which incorporates the chastity kink. I interpret it this way because (as lockedforher55 points out):To my way of thinking, the habits of people who dabble with chastity are too varied to be a coherent set.Definition of Lifestyle: a set of attitudes, habits, or possessions associated with a particular person or group
Again, apologies for my initial response coming across as harsh. I have a perfectly good idea in my head, that for some reason just can't make it across the keyboard.
Believe me when I say there was no misunderstanding what his words said. If he didn't mean them the way they sounded, then he should have proofed his post before submitting.ChrissysProperty wrote:Hooray! Total misunderstanding of words! Nice one Tom!
I don't think I indicated that I thought it was natural OR automatic. I merely asked for inputTom Allen wrote: I was really responding to what I read into this sentence:What I took from that was hiskh thinking that there is a natural or automatic incorporation of humiliation that came along with the chastity kink. And in my own defense, I think that most of us have run across this attitude in many other places around the internet.I am not really into this either but I am very interested as to why it (i.e., humiliation) seems to be a part of the life style.
Why didn't you just say this to begin with? That was all I was asking.Tom Allen wrote: Mrs. Edge and I do not incorporate any humiliation - it's a turn-off for both of us. I happen to know that there are other people who are fairly similar in practice, because I hear from them often. The only thing differentiating what they do from plain vanilla life is that they are locked up at their wife's discretion. There's no doing humiliating tasks, no dressing in humiliating clothing, no being forced to go to the doctor's or the gym, or wherever, with the risk or probability of discovery.
Once again, I apologize for the way it came out. I don't have any other explanation.hiskh wrote:Why didn't you just say this to begin with? That was all I was asking.Tom Allen wrote: Mrs. Edge and I do not incorporate any humiliation - it's a turn-off for both of us. I happen to know that there are other people who are fairly similar in practice, because I hear from them often. The only thing differentiating what they do from plain vanilla life is that they are locked up at their wife's discretion. There's no doing humiliating tasks, no dressing in humiliating clothing, no being forced to go to the doctor's or the gym, or wherever, with the risk or probability of discovery.
woahhhh thought this was directed towards me as well.... my input to the shitstorm is simplyTom Allen wrote:First, repeat this mantra:hiskh wrote:I am not really into this either but I am very interested as to why it seems to be a part of the life style.
It's not a flipping lifestyle.
The range of what people enjoying this kink are into varies widely. I suspect that the overwhelming majority of users are just regular, vanilla-ish folks who are just using the devices on a semi-regular basis to have some harmless fun. Humiliation, cuckolding, cross-dressing, sissification, BDSM, etc., are not necessarily regular adjuncts to the kink; rather, people who are already kinky have stumbled across chastity devices and have incorporated them. So, you have 2 classes of users, but probably the kinkier ones are already more open about discussing the side kinks. My estimation is that we don't often hear from the mainly vanilla folks on the boards, at least, not with the frequency that the other groups tend to express themselves.
Nothing wrong with it if that's what you like, but dont' get the idea that there is some kind of "chastity lifestyle" that automatically incorporates various other interests.