Has anyone seen this device?

[chasteinhaiku]

Interesting!

I'm hoping that in the near future there will be many more CB manufacturers out there for us to choose from.

It's great to be able to purchase a high quality steel device and not spend hundreds of dollars!

It would be awesome if someone figured out a way to create a steel version of the CB6000... something that would allow you to change the size and experiment for the best fit.

[chasteinhaiku]

Lol.

My girlfriend pulled this out last night and told me to go put it on.

http://www.fetishtoybox.com/THE-TOTAL-L ... FZC010.htm

She bought it as a surprise.

It's kind of ridiculous but I was touched and turned on that she enjoys keeping me locked enough to go buy a device for me on her own.

It's the first device I've worn where I had to squeeze the boys through a solid ring... I've always used hinged rings. I'm very happy of myself for getting it on as solid rings have always kinda squeeked me out.

Anyway, it's weird having the balls encased along with the shaft... very different.

The device weighs a ton and is def not something I'd wear long term. It's more just for short term fun, I suppose. And it's not exactly inconspicuous!

The Tight Squeeze is still far and away my favorite device!

[jack]

It appears that this thread has caused an increase of business at Fetish Toy Box. In the past few days, they have trippled the price of some of their CDs. The tight squeeze which was around $55 is now $191. I think the same goes for the tormentor model.

I was thinking of buying the tormentor until they raised the price last week. Now, it is expensive enough to seriously consider buying a better, more expensive custom device instead. Plus, I really don't think these are stainless steel regardless of what their ad states.

While I am still happy with the tight squeeze, I am just not sure it is worth the current cost.

[chasteinhaiku]

They were on sale before. I was thinking they were marked down because the product was being discontinued.

Why do you think that the Tight Squeeze isn't stainless steel?

[jack]

I am making an assumption that it is not stainless. The surface has a bright chrome finish. I have never seen stainless have this type of a finish. Why would you chrome stainless steel?

I could be wrong. I only have a limited knowledge about metals. But, it seems way too shiny for stainless.

[jack]

Thought I might post an update to the "tight squeeze". Been wearing it for over a month 24/7 with no issues to speak of. It seems to be holding up just fine and is very comfortable.

My wife lets me out when we play and then puts me right back in. I have not touched my dick in the past 30 days other than to wash it before or after play. She has put it back on so many times now that it takes her about 30 seconds.

I did end upgetting a 1.875" base ring for better comfort. I typically forget that I have the CD on. I use some silicone lube around the base of the ring to prevent chaffing. My only complaint would be a minor one, where the base ring comes together on top, it can sometimes grab a hair and give it a tug. Shaving the top of my penis solved this issue. But, I am quite happy with it overall.

[chasteinhaiku]

Awesome. Mine has been great, too.

I found a ton of wholesale vendors selling the Tight Squeeze on dhgate.com. Some of them will allow you to order single devices for as low as $50.

I currently have the 1.5, 1.625, and 1.75 rings. I alternate between them as needed.

I use a stocking to get myself into the tube as much as possible. Once it's on I can totally forget about it.

I'm not nearly as locked up as you are, Jack. I do a lot of activities that require me to be free of the device so I'm out almost every day for a stretch. But outside of those activities and lots of playtime I stay locked.