Page 2 of 2

Re: Inverted Chastity cages

Posted: Sat Mar 04, 2023 7:11 am
by Tom Allen
I understand the theory involved. I guess I'm just not willing to risk the experiment on myself. 😉

Re: Inverted Chastity cages

Posted: Sat Mar 04, 2023 7:27 am
by Atone
Mr Pickle wrote: Sat Mar 04, 2023 6:42 am Without the insert it would be messy.
without the insert I don't even see how it would work.
Tom Allen wrote: Sat Mar 04, 2023 7:11 am I understand the theory involved. I guess I'm just not willing to risk the experiment on myself. 😉
I played with an urethral insert a couple of times. Never for more than an hour or so. I have done a lot of things and this is one that I never got in to. I tolerated it because it was a means to an end but putting something in my urethra was, well, icky.

Re: Inverted Chastity cages

Posted: Sat Mar 04, 2023 8:23 am
by Mr Pickle
Tom Allen wrote: Sat Mar 04, 2023 7:11 am I understand the theory involved. I guess I'm just not willing to risk the experiment on myself. 😉
If I wasn't locked and C hadn't forbidden the idea I think I'd be trying it out already. Just to see wtf it feels like😂.

So. About these steel ball cages...

Re: Inverted Chastity cages

Posted: Sat Mar 04, 2023 10:47 am
by TwistedMister
BWiley wrote: Fri Mar 03, 2023 6:44 pm Actually every time you pee, you are flushing the inside with sterile fluid...
A common misconception, but not true. Pee in a clean plastic bottle, cap it tightly and leave it for a couple of weeks, see what happens.

Re: Inverted Chastity cages

Posted: Sat Mar 04, 2023 5:13 pm
by Michele
Atone wrote: Sat Mar 04, 2023 7:27 am was, well, icky.
Haha I see the way I talk is starting to rub off on you lmao 😁❤️

Re: Inverted Chastity cages

Posted: Fri Mar 10, 2023 10:53 pm
by Jon Descer
I wondered about these things years ago; I figured someone would make it, to appeal to the "feminization" crowd. But it does seem gross to me. Not because of the tube, but, you know, you sweat, dirt gets into places, etc. Having everything scrunched down and inside your body would basically make it a great breeding ground for bacteria. Even a really small normal cage still lets you get in there with q-tips and wash, and at least let water in to rinse out the worst of the...build-up.

Honestly, if someone wants this look or sensation for a short-term experience, I think it would make more sense as a full belt; you could push the tackle boxes inside you, then the rod, and lock them down with like a plastic or metal thong, really making it seem like you've got nothing down there. But this guy seems a little uncomfortable.

Re: Inverted Chastity cages

Posted: Fri Mar 17, 2023 5:47 am
by Tom Allen
Jon Descer wrote: Fri Mar 10, 2023 10:53 pm Honestly, if someone wants this look or sensation for a short-term experience, I think it would make more sense as a full belt;
I do agree with you on this point. However, newbie chastity users are notoriously cheap (or poor) and often complain about spending $20 on Chinese cages. They'd never consider dropping $200+ on the Chinese filull belts ones. 😂

Re: Inverted Chastity cages

Posted: Sat Mar 18, 2023 5:32 pm
by Jon Descer
Probably for the best, so they don't rush in and force themselves to over-wear something like that, winding up with some horrid infections.