PA vs Fernum

For the gearheads in the audience
Post Reply
Posts: 8
Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2017 12:29 pm
Location: Northern Ohio

PA vs Fernum

Post by PatMcGroin » Fri Apr 06, 2018 1:59 pm

There are a lot of posts about piercings for chastity. Most if not all on this board talk about Prince Albert. Does anyone have advice on a fernum piercing instead? Are they more susceptible to migration than a PA? A lot of manufacturers have it as an option.
0 x

User avatar
Tom Allen
Site Admin
Posts: 4158
Joined: Sat Sep 25, 2010 9:27 pm
Location: Southern New England, USA

Re: PA vs Fernum

Post by Tom Allen » Sat Apr 07, 2018 12:54 pm

I tried it with a CB3000 years ago, and it didn't work out well. I suspect that there was no way for the frenum to get enough of an airing out, especially with everything squished into the cage.

I got it because I really do not want a PA or some of the convenience issues that go with it. After a year or two of trying, I ended up taking it out and letting it heal up.
0 x

Posts: 457
Joined: Sat Mar 29, 2014 10:22 am

Re: PA vs Fernum

Post by jfenoffti » Tue Apr 10, 2018 11:02 am

The location of your piercing will probably make a difference. Mine is relatively close, or shallow. I've seen photos of other frenum piercings that appear to be lower on the shaft and or "deeper" into the skin. Those would have more strength or resiliency I think.

I attempted to use my frenum piercing to keep me at the end of the tube to make urinating easier and neater. Didn't work. Too much shrinkage, just pulled the skin around the piercing. I now have a properly sized cage and could easily wear something in the piercing but do not. I remain at the end of the cage, urinating is not a problem. And I do not attempt to "pull out" of the back of the cage, so it's unnecessary for "security".
0 x
Formerly caged and enjoyed it.
Tease me, deny me, thrill me! Just do it slowly.

Post Reply