Looker 02.... Anatomical or not to anatomical???

For the gearheads in the audience
Post Reply
Sophie_caged
Posts: 14
Joined: Tue Oct 30, 2012 12:54 pm

Looker 02.... Anatomical or not to anatomical???

Post by Sophie_caged »

I'm looking for some advice please. I have a Looker 02 and I know the 45mm cockring fits nicely. But we were wondering if we went for the anatomical cockring with the bend at the bottom. Does this affect the size of the fitting in anyway?

Many thanks in advance for any replies.
0 x
User avatar
Atone
Posts: 2665
Joined: Sat Sep 25, 2010 9:24 pm
Gender:

Re: Looker 02.... Anatomical or not to anatomical???

Post by Atone »

Sophie_caged wrote:Does this affect the size of the fitting in anyway?
Yes, it makes the gap larger at the middle of the bottom. If it is too big then you risk a testicle popping out so be mindful of this.

I seem to be in the minority on this but I did not like the anatomical ring. I had both in the same size and the flat ring was more comfortable to me. That could be partly due to the larger gap though. If I ever send my current tube back I might try another anatomical ring in the smaller size that I wear now.
0 x
Sophie_caged
Posts: 14
Joined: Tue Oct 30, 2012 12:54 pm

Re: Looker 02.... Anatomical or not to anatomical???

Post by Sophie_caged »

I was wondering if I should go a size smaller too. But I was also wondering if the bend made the diameter smaller with the 45mm so that the testicles couldn't be push back through the ring.
0 x
Post Reply