Page 5 of 7

Re: The Permanent Chastity/Denial Matrix

Posted: Mon Dec 09, 2019 4:53 pm
by gungadn
Tom Allen wrote: Sat Dec 07, 2019 7:41 pm
We are both correct in our reasoning. Which one is accurate?
Just worry about your own situation - that's all you can do.
:+1:

Re: The Permanent Chastity/Denial Matrix

Posted: Tue Dec 10, 2019 12:34 am
by lockedforfun
Chastityat60 wrote: Mon Dec 09, 2019 12:16 pm I wonder if "locked for fun" could provide examples of his 1-4. I like the presentation of 5-10.
Oh, I was just assuming no change to Tom's 1-4:

0: Obviously, never locked, perhaps not even owning a device.
1: Has a device, worn sometimes for play.
2: Wears the device for extended play (a weekend, a week, maybe, once in a while).
3: Wears it for extended play fairly frequently
4: Wears it frequently, maybe several days a week, or maybe a week or two at a time.

Re: The Permanent Chastity/Denial Matrix

Posted: Tue Dec 10, 2019 12:37 am
by lockedforfun
Tom Allen wrote: Mon Dec 09, 2019 1:09 pm
Hmmm, and in addition to where you are on the matrix, what about offsets to where you wish you were?
Offsets. Man, you guys are even weirder and nerdier than I am. :lol:
Hey, I was thinking of taking the derivative dx/dy as the velocity of the relationship, but thought maybe I should draw the line at calculus.

Re: The Permanent Chastity/Denial Matrix

Posted: Tue Dec 10, 2019 8:40 am
by Tom Allen
I was thinking about adding a Z axis for something, but decided that things were already getting more complicated than I had intended.

Re: The Permanent Chastity/Denial Matrix

Posted: Tue Dec 10, 2019 7:49 pm
by fuzzydunlop
Hard numbers....mmmmm....

Re: The Permanent Chastity/Denial Matrix

Posted: Wed Dec 11, 2019 10:54 am
by cshorts
Maybe we should define the axes on the imaginary numbers plane to accommodate those guys who are just fantasizing about their chastity.

Re: The Permanent Chastity/Denial Matrix

Posted: Wed Dec 11, 2019 1:23 pm
by Tom Allen
cshorts wrote: Wed Dec 11, 2019 10:54 am Maybe we should define the axes on the imaginary numbers plane to accommodate those guys who are just fantasizing about their chastity.
Geez, you guys are weird.

Okay, here's a Z axis for you:

Z0: Wanker in a fantasy world. Probably no partner.
Z1: Wanker, has shopped for a device, but not ordered one.
Z3: Wanker, has device, hasn't told partner.
Z4: Has device, finally told horrified partner.
Z5: Has a device, partner not totally on board
Z6: Partner goes along, sometimes enjoys it.
Z7: Partner actively suggests using it.
Z8: Has several devices, partner enthusiastic about keyholding.
Z9: Partner even more enthusiastic than he is.
Z10: Partner has 100% control of keys, releases, etc.

Re: The Permanent Chastity/Denial Matrix

Posted: Wed Dec 11, 2019 3:20 pm
by cuyahoga
ROFL — 6.5 on the Z scale.

Re: The Permanent Chastity/Denial Matrix

Posted: Wed Dec 11, 2019 8:25 pm
by LOCKED HUSBAND
It took 5 years but have gone from Z 4 to Z 7 I think this is good what do you think ?

Re: The Permanent Chastity/Denial Matrix

Posted: Thu Dec 12, 2019 6:04 am
by Tom Allen
That's pretty good. Maybe we should keep the scale after all?