Page 1 of 1

Least threatening (male) devices to vanilla women

Posted: Sun Sep 08, 2019 10:30 pm
by CanuckInNJ
I know that opinions will vary widely, but I'm putting the question out there anyway:

What (male) devices horrify vanilla women the *least*? Which ones might even interest or excite them?

Canuck

Re: Least threatening (male) devices to vanilla women

Posted: Mon Sep 09, 2019 12:17 am
by slave d
When we started out MsM found the HT clear models least threatening as She could still see Her cock and the whole thing was smooth and not too noticeable. Later we went to s/s but now we’re back to HT nub in clear and its working very well !!

MsM’s ld

Re: Least threatening (male) devices to vanilla women

Posted: Mon Sep 09, 2019 7:54 am
by Tom Allen
Mrs Edge liked the clear CB3000 because she could see inside. She wasn't crazy about the black one.

Years later, she likes the A272. She can't see inside, but it's generally penis-shaped. She doesn't like the various Steelworks devices - they look like plumbing parts. She wants something nice and smooth along her lady bits.

She also is freaked out by those little nubby devices; they're too emasculating; she likes knowing I have a penis, and the cage enhances what she's locking up.

Obviously, other women will h ave different ideas.

Re: Least threatening (male) devices to vanilla women

Posted: Mon Sep 09, 2019 8:27 am
by sirmebane
When we started a few years back, I bought a cheap Chinese piece of steel and it was an enclosed cage and honestly a lot of metal between my legs. I knew I would move on but she hated it. This wasn't a good start and I quickly started shopping for something else... more open and lighter.

You never know what she will find threatening so talking about it is a good idea. I think it is fair to say that the more you look like yourself, the better it will be received.

Re: Least threatening (male) devices to vanilla women

Posted: Mon Sep 09, 2019 12:23 pm
by jfenoffti
Despite a non-vanilla start to our relationship (she was game for everything), she is very vanilla now.

We started with a "dick cage" (silicon). The Mrs did not like it. The HTv2 (black) was better received; probably because of the base ring as opposed to the DC's "cuff". Then, when I switched to a JB, initially, she said she liked the JailBird better because she could see me inside and it looked "cleaner". Not sure if that meant hygiene or aesthetics.

Ultimately, she has decided she does not like any. Period. End of story. :cry:

Re: Least threatening (male) devices to vanilla women

Posted: Tue Sep 10, 2019 3:33 pm
by locked4her55
jfenoffti wrote: Mon Sep 09, 2019 12:23 pm Ultimately, she has decided she does not like any. Period. End of story. :cry:
Sorry to hear that.

We started out with plastic and then onto a MM JB which she selected off their website.

Have tired a few plastic models since then but she really prefers the hygiene of stainless with somewhat of an open design for teasing.

Re: Least threatening (male) devices to vanilla women

Posted: Wed Sep 11, 2019 3:07 pm
by jfenoffti
Yeah, thanks. The hygiene factor was important, but she just can't get on board for longer than a few brief periods.

Re: Least threatening (male) devices to vanilla women

Posted: Wed Sep 11, 2019 8:23 pm
by Xileh
We have a MCN cage, and an A272 tube style device. She prefers the MCN cage. She likes seeing me extruding through the bars, and she likes to push her finger tips through the bars to play with the animal inside. It took a while for her to get used to seeing it. Then she decided she liked it.