Chastity Forums

Hi been locked up five days now getting horny

Hi moofey and welcome to the Forums.

How about heading here and posting a little bit about yourself.
viewtopic.php?f=2&t=6967&p=14607

Thanks, we'll all look forward to your contributions here.

locked4her55 wrote:Hi moofey and welcome to the Forums.

How about heading here and posting a little bit about yourself.
viewtopic.php?f=2&t=6967&p=14607

Thanks, we'll all look forward to your contributions here.

Hello I'm very interested in being dominated by my partner she has agreed to lock me up and only release me upon better behaviour she will also tease me I'm using a holy trainer device

I'm ten days into chastity and I won't be released until my behaviour improves using a holy trainer and very horny

I think we have a troll.

Namron wrote:I think we have a troll.

I don't know, he's not really acting like the 'classic' troll type. At a first guess, judging by the writing- run-on sentences and a lack of punctuation, I'd have to say poorly educated and/or not very bright.

There could be a remote chance that it is our multi-alias pal with a new schtick, but I'm not leaning that way.

TwistedMister wrote:I don't know, he's not really acting like the 'classic' troll type. At a first guess, judging by the writing- run-on sentences and a lack of punctuation, I'd have to say poorly educated and/or not very bright.

There could be a remote chance that it is our multi-alias pal with a new schtick, but I'm not leaning that way.

Subtle, very subtle...NOT!

I moderate another kink site, we Moderators would never put derogatory comments like that about a member on the public pages. We might comment and raise concerns on the Moderator Group, that's our job, but the job doesn't include running someone down because of their use of English - ours is a world-wide forum and many members have English as their second language, and not all members are well-educated.

I am disappointed.

Agree _Ij_ I run car board and we have private conversation like this with the other mods.

_lj_ wrote:Subtle, very subtle...NOT!

I moderate another kink site, we Moderators would never put derogatory comments like that about a member on the public pages. We might comment and raise concerns on the Moderator Group, that's our job, but the job doesn't include running someone down because of their use of English - ours is a world-wide forum and many members have English as their second language, and not all members are well-educated.

It was not intended to be subtle. There were posts you have not seen because they were deleted before ever making it onto the board, he has shown that he cannot/will not abide by rules and etiquette. I have been here a long time, and on boards since the days of dial-up bbs systems, FidoNet, the 'internet' before it became the 'web' with all its pretty pictures and general public access, usenet news groups, etc.

Over the decades I have observed correlations between writing and behavior. I am educated in five languages and have smatterings of several others. One of the things that most current, modern languages have in common is grammar and punctuation. I can usually tell when someone is having an issue because they are writing in a language that is not their primary language, for instance, the relatively new member 'aversimencierro'- it is clear to me that English is not his primary language and no judgement is made for that.

One of the major things about this board is that we do not want to see it turn into a place like the 'Mansion', it would be better to simply let it die than to turn into that. A correlation I have noticed is that the poorer the writing skills, the more of a tendency there is to go in that direction. We wish this place to remain a reality-based forum where mature conversations can take place.

Personally, rather than banning people, I prefer to let them come to the conclusion on their own that this is not the place for them, and they are not going to get the reactions they desire, I let *them* make the choice not to participate rather than making it *for* them. I tend not to operate in 'secret' like a 'ruler' making decisions behind the scenes, but rather in the open, subject to criticism and, unlike some other forums I don't believe in the hard-line approach of a complete prohibition of discussions of moderators and their actions. Your opinion has been noted and considered.