tcs wrote:Cheap chastity devices are new, but some of the fundamentals of erotic denial have been around as long as people have been thinking about sex. Ever see or read Lysistrata?
I would love to see what would happen if someone digging around a Neanderthal or early modern human site dug up artwork of a domina.
finallyhappy wrote:I would be surprised if any woman said yes. Very few woman are dominate or controlling by nature. Most women want a dominate in control man.
That is because of social constructs, not an innate disability or evolutionary development. Five thousand years of patriarchal social constructs have suppressed women into subservient roles, backed by holy books and religions.
Of note, the modern protest movement in the USA was started by the women's temperance movement (those lovely ladies trying to outlaw booze and foisting off the XVIII Amendment on us, and force women back into the kitchen). Little did they expect they would be the direct cause of granting women the right to vote.
WWII finished off any scientific ideas about the inferiority of women to dominate the workplace, when all the men went off to war and the women ran the economy. When the men returned and demanded industry give their jobs back, the modern feminist movement was born from the backlash.
James, not subservient, but acknowledging who in this family is best suited to run the household finances and my O's.
Perhaps you can elaborate? Also, 10 women? 10? That is so small a number you could never hope to draw any conclusion from that.
