Is smaller better?

For the gearheads in the audience

Is smaller better?

Postby Betterthansmith » Wed Feb 28, 2018 12:08 pm

I saw this on thumper's blog the other day and have also been looking at some of the reviews..

Previously I had a jailbird - about 1.75 length so 2" with the gap. Thumper (and others) have suggested that going really small actually helps when it comes to nighttime erections and obviously more concealed....

I'm a grower and not a show-er... (but above average (just!) when fully grown!)

What do people think? Is smaller better?

Here's an example: https://www.amazon.com/Happygo-Convenie ... d_cp_121_2
Betterthansmith
 
Posts: 86
Joined: Sat Jan 25, 2014 9:11 am

Re: Is smaller better?

Postby slave d » Wed Feb 28, 2018 3:07 pm

FWIW MsM has purchased several very small devices for me to wear including the one you have linked to and they're great for me BUT i'm not called "little dickie" for nothing and these days can't manage much over 4" erect and i'm tiny when soft. Biggest issue She's had is finding a small enough device that then has a small enough gap and is well enough constructed that the gap doesn't get bigger because of loose connections between the cage and the A-ring. She has finally come up with this one which i have now been in for well over a year now with zero issues. Love the ergonomic A-ring of it too and it's well built and cheap enough to just give a try. Incidentally MsM puts a drop of fine oil on the lock each time i bathe and works the key back and forth a few times and we've never had a lock failure with any of these either. MsM currently has about three small devices all using the same lock so spares are there if needed. This is the one i'm in now:

https://www.dhgate.com/product/super-sm ... 76402.html

MsM's ld
New Zealand
24/7/365 DHGate s/s
User avatar
slave d
 
Posts: 613
Joined: Mon Feb 24, 2014 9:33 pm

Re: Is smaller better?

Postby Betterthansmith » Wed Feb 28, 2018 3:13 pm

Thanks for the reply.... how about hygiene? Is that an issue when its all scrunched up in there? (I'm cut if that helps...)
Betterthansmith
 
Posts: 86
Joined: Sat Jan 25, 2014 9:11 am

Re: Is smaller better?

Postby slave d » Wed Feb 28, 2018 11:09 pm

I’m cut too and no there’s zero hygiene issue in the s/s cage. MsM allows the removal of the cage only (A-ring stays in place) about once a month for cleaning of the inside of the cage and a better shave for me (i’m clean shaven from crutch to shoulders.

MsM’s ld
New Zealand
24/7/365 DHGate s/s
User avatar
slave d
 
Posts: 613
Joined: Mon Feb 24, 2014 9:33 pm

Re: Is smaller better?

Postby Jon Descer » Wed Feb 28, 2018 11:32 pm

It's pretty much a consensus at this point. As long as you are able to keep it clean, in some way or other, yes, smaller is better. Definitely okay to go shorter (you can pretty much squeeze any piece down into an inch or two), pretty okay to go a little narrower but you need to be more careful on that, so that when you do get an erection, blood flow doesn't get constricted.
Jon Descer
 
Posts: 33
Joined: Fri Apr 29, 2016 11:42 pm


Return to Chastity Devices

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests